Commercial Real Estate Blog by Madison
Tag Archives: New York Court of Appeals

Isn’t it Time to Jettison Adverse Possession Laws?

By Terence Guerriere, Esq., Executive Vice President, Madison Commercial Real Estate Services

Adverse possession is a method of acquiring title to real property by possessing it for a statutory period under certain conditions. The doctrine of adverse possession has been a part of American law since the founding of our country; a precept of western civilization’s legal system for centuries. However, perhaps it is time to recognize that the idea that an owner of real property should lose title to his land, simply because someone else has been using it, is a relic of the past.

The primary reason for the development of adverse possession law was to promote the productive use of property. If an absent owner did not tend to his land, the land would not produce food or other benefits for society. This certainly made sense during the time of an agrarian society. Today, however, there is little fear that we would not be able to feed, clothe and house our citizens by allowing land to lay fallow.
Is it time to lift the burden from the land owner of record and shift it to the possessor of land he doesn’t own?
Continue reading

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Comments Off

Appeals Court Addresses Insurer’s Duty to Defend

By: Debra Smith, Esq., Associate General Counsel, MCRES

In a recent case, K2 Investment Group, LLC, et al. v., American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company, 21 N.Y. 3d 384, 993 N.E. 2d 1249, 917 N.Y.S. 2d 229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013), the New York Court of Appeals addressed the duty of an insurer to defend its insured. Even though this case did not involve title insurance, it will likely be cited in title and other insurance litigation involving the duty an insurance company has to its insured.
In this case, the plaintiffs made loans to be secured by mortgages. Following default, the plaintiffs commenced an action against various parties, including Jeffrey Daniels, a lawyer, for legal malpractice. The insured tendered the claim to his malpractice carrier, American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company. The complaint contained allegations that the insured was a principal of the borrower. The plaintiffs alleged that the insured failed to record the mortgages and obtain title insurance. American Guarantee denied the claim and did not tender a defense based on a policy exclusion for claims arising out of an insured’s actions undertaken in his capacity as a member or owner of a business enterprise.
Here is the Court’s decision. Continue reading

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux